Showing posts with label Platform. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Platform. Show all posts

Tuesday, 7 April 2015

Publishing Platform RebelMouse Nabs $6 Million In An Extended Series A Growth Round

John Oliver Just Changed The Surveillance Reform Debate
Content publishing platform RebelMouse has raised $6 million in an extended Series A from previous investors Softbank Capital and Oak Investment Partners, with additional participation from Buddy Media’s Mike Lazerow. This brings the total up to $18.8 million total for the startup.
An SEC filing first alerted us to the news that something was going on, however this was apparently an exchange of $16 million in stock for the company. Founder and CEO Paul Berry later confirmed to TechCrunch that there had been a growth round that had closed at the beginning of this year.
RebelMouse started out as a way for companies to aggregate their social media networks into a “social front page.” It has since morphed into a full CMS platform for brands and media. But it was just a twinkle in Berry’s eye back in his days as the Huffington Post’s CTO.
Berry built the Huffington Post from scratch back in 2007 after it came to his attention that people wanted to share content on the site. Soon other media sites were asking how Berry could help them do the same thing and RebelMouse was born.
People who create great content shouldn’t have to have the tech team to handle all that for them.— RebelMouse founder Paul BerryA full publishing platform is where Berry says he always intended his startup to go. As social media marketing grew up, RebelMouse grew with it. “We realized that aggregating tweets on a page won’t really go viral,” Berry told TechCrunch.
RebelMouse now helps startups, media sites and brands build out sites around social media marketing with an easy-to-use interface. It has also added the ability to build mobile applications and native apps through the platform as well as content communities and social A/B testing as notifications get pushed out into other networks.
The idea is similar in many ways to WordPress or Drupal – though Berry contends these other CMS platforms are difficult for those creating the content to operate. “It’s a totally different approach to the same problem,” Berry said. “People who create great content shouldn’t have to have the tech team to handle all that for them.”
Related ArticlesRebelMouse Expands Its Publisher Tools With The River, A Personalized NewsfeedSocial Media Aggregator RebelMouse Raises $10.25M
RebelMouse introduced The River late last year. This is a content aggregation tool that looks similar to the newsfeed river we display on the front page of TechCrunch. The startup is also working on a few stealth projects with several brands. Berry hinted at something brewing with GE around a new content experience, though he said he couldn’t elaborate on that just yet.
Some of the new funding will go towards improving on the product and to amp up the product and tech teams, but the majority will be used to hire more sales people, particularly those who can go after household brands and media sites. RebelMouse already hired Craig Fanning, the previous Western regional sales director at Adobe, to help it accomplish the goal of bringing in bigger enterprise clients.
“Hiring on the sales team and going for more media and brands is our most important focus right now,” said Berry.

Thursday, 2 April 2015

Y Combinator-Backed PicnicHealth Nabs $2 Million In Seed To Build Out A Virtual Healthcare Records Platform

Freestyle Capital Locks Down $60M For Its Third Fund, Adds Jenny Lefcourt As Its Third PartnerPicnicHealth launched out of Y Combinator last summer with a service that promised to help chronically ill patients gather all their records from all their doctors and put them in one easy-to-access online profile. The startup has now raised $2 million in seed funding to build that service out and hire more team members.
The funding comes from a slew of VC firms and angel investors, including Social+Captial, Great Oaks, Slow Ventures, YC partner Paul Buchheit, Scott Marlette, Sam Lessin, Joe Greenstein, Rashmi Sinha, Jameson Hsu, Kenny Van Zant, Rishi Kacker, Ramji Srinivasan, Eric Evans and Stanford’s StartX Fund.
The seed investment and roster of individuals is a testament to the wide-open market in health IT. While there are similar health IT companies dealing with patient information such as TrueVault and Aptible, the focus has been on delivering secure information to medical personnel rather than to the patient.
But patients, especially the chronically ill, often need access to their own medical records, says PicnicHealth co-founder Noga Leviner. She learned about these struggles first-hand after being diagnosed with Crohn’s disease a few years back.
“For those diagnosed with a serious illness, coping with emotional strain and physical effects is just the beginning,” said Noga. “Patients then face the job of coordinating care. This depends on collecting, organizing, and distributing a growing mountain of medical records.”
Dr. Aileen Kuscera at One Medical reaffirmed the archaic process. “A lot of this has to do with privacy and HIPAA compliance. We can’t have all your records out there on the web,” she told me.
One Medical is at least handling things online. It currently emails patients about lab work and test results. However, some organizations still keep records on a paper file or on CD. “I don’t even know where I’d put a CD on my computer. There’s no way to access that,” Kuscera told me.

PicnicHealth solves this by doing the heavy lifting for the patient. Patients give permission for a records request at each medical facility and then PicnicHealth pulls all the information it can, including old files, CDs and other data and adds that to the patient’s personal online database that they can access anywhere.
Related ArticlesPicnicHealth Stores Your Medical Records In One Place And Delivers It To Your DoctorOur Four Favorite Startups From The StartX Summer 2014 Demo Day
PicnicHealth plans to use the money to hire a bunch of engineers, as well as build out a servicing component to help pull data from CDs, hard copies of paperwork and other non-digital files that are hard to get data from. It also plans to customize for specific communities starting with cancer and cystic fibrosis.
Some of the money will also go toward marketing and to making the current platform more efficient. PicnicHealth is currently $39 per month, but also plans to release a series of free resources to improve access to medical records for all patients.

Tuesday, 31 March 2015

Facebook’s Messenger Platform Must Go Beyond Apps And Embrace The Web

Tidal Confirms Partnership With Sprint Owner Softbank For Its Artist Co-Owned Music ServiceFacebook’s Messenger Platform Must Go Beyond Apps And Embrace The WebAdvertisementFacebook’s move to turn Messenger into a platform for third parties has been one of the company’s most important decisions to date. Mobile messaging is a pivotal trend that will shape the way billions of people consume the Internet.
 It has the potential to overhaul the dynamics of digital distribution, but Facebook’s platform must go beyond hosting apps and become a mobile web experience if it is to have a shot at mainstream success.
Smartphones have long been heralded as the great leveler that will bring Internet access to billions of new users for the first time. With that shift now starting to take place — among both younger and older demographics in Western markets, and beyond the more affluent consumers in emerging markets — mobile is now radically changing the way that the Internet is used. Today, it is inherently a mobile-first model, to the point that many people don’t consider the apps on their phone — and primarily Facebook — to be part of the Internet.
With that backdrop, the ‘platformization’ of Facebook is designed with the aim of owning the smartphone Internet experience in a way that is unprecedented so far in the West.

Disruption
New in the West it may be, but there are already examples that Facebook can follow for its blueprint. Messaging apps in Asia have been platforms for games, camera apps, multimedia, and more for a couple of years now. The most striking example is in China, where WeChat, an app from billion-dollar Internet firm Tencent, has grown into the primary mobile Internet portal.
jdwechatShopping inside Weixin — image via Technode
Weixin, the Chinese-version of WeChat, is basically the mobile Internet for China.
That’s to say that, beyond text or video chats with friends, you can do all manner of things: book a taxi; read news; shop at e-commerce stores; order take-out; and pay bills.
The Weixin platform is open for any company to build on. They can, for example, develop their own optimized Weixin sites, which is basically a website optimized for the messaging service with some native functionality.
In some cases, that’s all you need for distribution in China. Food on-demand startup Call A Chicken raised $1.6 million off the back of its Weixin app. It doesn’t even have a website; it doesn’t need one.
Ordering a taxi via Weixin -- image via Tech In AsiaOrdering a taxi via Weixin — image via Tech In Asia
So Weixin is akin to a consumer-friendly skin for the Internet. It is literally a gateway to the web, which makes it hugely powerful and influential.
That is the level of disruption we are talking about here.
Though it is undoubtedly inspired by Weixin — it’s hard not to be — Facebook is taking a different approach. Initially, at least. It is using the app platform route pioneered most prominently by Japanese chat app Line, which plugs a selection of apps from invited partners into its service. It isn’t open to all, and you are taken to a standalone app outside of Messenger when using these partner apps.
Line, which has over 500 million registered users and is predominantly focused on gaming, has more than 50 apps that let you play social games with friends, take quirky photos, and use other utility apps that are optimized for its chat app and are tied to your social graph there. Kakao Talk, a service in Korea, has a similar system — that’s helped it turn in profit and dominate the iOS and Google Play store charts.
Unlike Weixin, Line is a closed network. App makers are invited into its ecosystem. Most are games companies that re-skin their titles for Line (using its SDK). These games are published under Line’s name, using what appears to be a revenue share deal. They are popular, too. The Line games platform is approaching 400 million cumulative downloads, while games accounted for over half of Line’s $200 million revenue in Q4 2014.
Disney TsumTsum is one of Line’s most popular games
Line is beginning to move into new content, having launched a fund to invest in online-to-offline services, because its financial success is so dependent on games. Parent company Naver missed its most recent financial target because Line’s top games didn’t perform as expected, but, as an app ecosystem, broadening the scope is harder for Line than it is for Tencent/Weixin, which can integrate new services with relative ease — its latest push has been restaurant listings and location-based services.
Cracking the U.S.
Facebook isn’t focused on games for Messenger, at this point, although it has run tests highlighting them inside the app. Instead it seems to be leaning on media via the integration of third-party apps like GIF portal Giphy, news content like ESPN and its own selfie apps. While it has launched a potentially useful feature that lets consumers and business converse via Messenger (it’s remarkably similar to what mobile social network Path offers) it’s interesting that there’s no immediate integration with Uber (Google is an investor, and Uber allows one-click taxi calling in third-party apps) or on-demand apps like Postmates or music services, which are inherently social in nature.
It could be that these services will be integrated with Messenger in the future. That is necessary if Messenger is to become a useful internal portal like WeChat. However one reason for this initial approach could be that Facebook is first focused on cracking the U.S., which is the second-largest smartphone market behind China and, crucially, a place where no single chat app has won out.
Its Messenger for business platform, the aforementioned replacement for email, requires local customer service teams and actual resources to be effective, so that will entail gradual rollouts worldwide as opposed to automated integration that can roll out fast. But beyond that, there are important cultural differences in mobile consumption that make creating a powerful messaging platform in the U.S. more challenging than in Asia.
Primarily that is because Messenger and other rival apps don’t provide features or a use case that consumers are immediately compelled by. In Asia, free text messaging and Internet-powered voice calls are attractive because many consumers are on pre-pay mobile deals — that accounts for over 90 percent of mobile users in India, for example.
For those people, text messages are not free (whether sold as a bundled deal or individual pricing) while equally, in many countries, calling someone who is on a different mobile network is charged at a higher rate than calls made on the same network. (Hence dual SIM devices are popular because it is cheaper to use different SIMs to call different people.)
In these cases, the free communications of Line, WeChat, WhatsApp and even Messenger have immediate value that hooks a user in and keeps them. When you sign up for Line in Thailand, for example, you’ll find most of your phone book contacts are there already, which increases the chances that you’ll become a heavy user. With that sticky user experience as its foundation, chat apps in Asia have moved into offer-related services and content like taxis, shopping, payments and more.
But the high use of iMessage and the near low (free) cost of SMS in the U.S. makes it trickier to make such a compelling use case. The same is true for Twitter DMs, Facebook Messenger and other other social networks: If you have used other services to communicate with friends for free for years, why switch now?
It’s early days, but it looks like Facebook is tapping the ‘SMS+’ route with Messenger. That’s to say that it is offering features that you can’t find in regular SMS, the idea being that the appeal of sending GIFs or goofy selfies, is a trigger that will make people switch their usual channel for conversations to Messenger. Media companies like ESPN are also early partners to give another reason beyond communication to check Messenger daily.

The U.S. chat app space is nascent so it’s not known if this will work. Snapchat offered a very differentiated service, initially at least, with disappearing photos. That worked among a young demographic, and Snapchat has matured as a product — and also turning into a platform — to offer more public photo sharing and add a media facet to its business with the launch of its Discover service. Initial reports suggest that Discover is sending plenty of business to its early media partners, but it’s impossible to gauge whether it is increasing engagement among loyal users and broadening Snapchat’s audience beyond early users because the company doesn’t provide user numbers.
From what I’ve witnessed in Asia, media and photo integrations are fun, but messaging apps get interesting when they offer more compelling, everyday services. I was pretty blown away during a recent trip to Beijing when my Airbnb host booked me a taxi in a few clicks from inside Weixin; almost in an instant, it was done and she went back to chatting with her friends. That’s a compelling use case because it lowers the friction point for using a range of services from your phone.
In another example, friends of mine in Thailand often moan about Line. Yet, despite their grumblings about the app, they are daily users because it is bigger than Facebook here and has become a must-have for anyone in the country. With on-demand groceries planned, a TV platform with exclusive content, and other services like taxi booking starting out in Japan, Line might as well be pre-bundled on devices; it’s arguably more important than a phone’s native calling app.
Line has an array of connected apps and gamesCompetition
This is the route Facebook is taking, but in order to become a daily must-have app — especially in the U.S. — it needs to be far more compelling than it initially is.
If Facebook needs more local, Western examples beyond Snapchat — which it famously tried to buy for $3 billion — then Canada-based Kik is one to watch.
It’s a veteran in this space, having launched an SDK that let mobile apps plug into its ‘platform’ way back in 2011. Timing is so often about consumer behavior — just ask the video sharing companies that hit the market before Meerkat and Periscope took off — and Kik’s platform failed because it was too early. That said, the company learned lessons and pivoted to a WeChat-style web-based platform last year, claiming that the change would reduce friction when using third-party services and provide an easier experience all round.
If I send you a GIF on Messenger and you like the content and want to do the same yourself, you’ll have to download that third-party app. You hit the link inside Messenger and are directed to the App Store or Google Play to get the app. A minute or two after downloading it, you sign in to Giphy For Messenger with your Facebook creds and return to Messenger to sync it up and start sharing your own creations.
There’s a lot of waiting around and moving parts in that process. To make things easier, Kik put an HTML5-based browser inside its messaging app so that I can visit the Giphy website, find the GIF I want and quickly ‘Kik’ it over to our chat window within seconds. No app install is needed, and I can share content from any website that way — even this article, for example. Site owners can add a snippet of code to optimize their website for Kik sharing, and add native app features like push notifications.
Sharing a link in Kik is easy
In taking a web-centric approach, rather than the app-based route of Facebook Messenger, Kik opened itself up to any website or service. That brings the potential for many opportunities beyond just GIF sharing, because sharing any kind of web content on Kik requires minimal effort from consumers, and is easy for developers.
Things will get more interesting when Kik adds a payment service this year. In theory, you’ll be able to shop on Amazon inside Kik — and share items with friends — even without Amazon even adding support. The process could be made slicker if Amazon chooses to support Kik’s platform.
CrunchBaseFacebookFounded2004  OverviewFacebook is an online social networking service that allows its users to connect with friends and family as well as make new connections. It provides its users with the ability to create a profile, update information, add images, send friend requests, and accept requests from other users. Its features include status update, photo tagging and sharing, and more.Facebook’s profile structure includes …LocationMenlo Park, CaliforniaCategoriesCommunities, Colleges, Identity, All Students, Facebook Applications, Social MediaFoundersMark ZuckerbergWebsitehttp://www.facebook.comFull profile for FacebookKikFounded2009  OverviewKik was founded in 2009, when a small but incredibly passionate group of University of Waterloo students decided to build a company that would shift the center of computing from the PC to the phone.Based in Waterloo, Ontario the company now has about 40 employees working on Kik Messenger, the simplest, fastest, most life-like chat experience on a smartphone. In November 2012 the company introduced …LocationWaterloo, OntarioCategoriesMessaging, Games, MobileWebsitehttp://kik.com/Full profile for Kik
With 200 million registered users, Kik is nothing like as popular as Facebook Messenger (600 million active users) worldwide, but it does claim to be on par with its competition in the U.S. Users in the U.S., it claimed, spend 35 minutes per day inside its app. That’s a number only bettered by Facebook: which a report estimated sees 37 minutes per session on average.
It is primarily popular with a younger audience thanks to features like usernames — which avoids the need to share your phone number — and its compatibility with the iPod Touch a couple of years ago. But Kik CEO and co-founder Ted Livingston believes that the next generation of young people are naturally drawn to chat and will want to do a lot more inside messaging apps.
“Young consumers in the West are like all consumers in the East. They haven’t yet decided where to bank, where to shop, or what games to play. But they all chat,” Livingston told TechSupport recently.
The challenge for Facebook is that it doesn’t own this demographic in the U.S.. In fact, Facebook is so ubiquitous that it is difficult to appeal to everyone. Clearly it needs to offer something more than just media to stand out, and useful integrations seem like a no-brainer.
The prospects of success for Messenger are pretty rosier overseas, in spite of chat apps in Asia. Forget what you might have read about Facebook’s impending demise, it is still huge in places like Africa and Asia, even in some countries where chat apps are well established. Chat apps are often for communicating with your close circle, but Facebook covers a wider audience — for example, I quickly found that it is used instead of LinkedIn across most of Asia.
There are plenty of markets in Asia where no clear messaging app has won out. With the right integrations, Facebook Messenger could gobble up market share in those places, even though WhatsApp will remain a platform-free messaging app. But, while the initial signs are promising, Facebook has much to do to develop Messenger. It would be wise to follow the open, intranet-like Weixin mode.

Saturday, 7 March 2015

With $45 Million In Funding, Augmented Reality Platform Blippar Is Rethinking Search

Apple Watch Sounding More Independent In Latest LeakBlippar, an augmented reality ad platform that uses real-world tags to deliver extra AR content in offline situations, has raised $45 million in new funding from undisclosed investors. This comes on the heels of a big 2014 for UK-based Blippar, wherein the company made its first acquisition by purchasing Layar in June. Combined, the merged companies boast over 50 million global users.
But given the growth of the space, Blippar is ready to take the next step forward.
As it stands now, Blippar is mostly an advertising or publishing tool that allows a brand to put a “Blip” (a real-world marker) on their offline goods that allow users to access an AR layer of information through their camera. It’s a speedy, beautiful product, but people are only so interested in chatting with brands.
Blippar founder Rish Mitra sees far more expansive applications for the technology, the most important of which is search.
“Words actually don’t help us out all that much,” said Mitra. “When you see a red dress on the street in New York, there’s no way to accurately describe that dress in a search on the internet. You would use a different description than I would, or someone else would, based on our differing perceptions.”
With the new version of Blippar (which doesn’t require real-world markers), users would ideally be able to point their camera at any object (like an apple or a red dress) and instantly see all of the extra information around it, like a purchasing page or a conversation around that object on Twitter or Instagram or videos on YouTube.
Obviously, the system won’t simply change overnight. Blippar is unveiling its latest technology next week at SXSW and will start in a few verticals, including Movies, Music, Books (fiction) and US-based sports teams, and expand into new verticals on a “week-by-week basis.”
But at scale, this changes Blippar’s model significantly. With physical markers, Blippar’s growth was limited to brokering individual deals with various brands (quite successfully, for that matter, with more than 2,500 brands on board). By making every object ‘blippable’, the company no longer has to grow on a product-by-product basis but can sell advertising space on just about anything.

Wednesday, 11 February 2015

Capital Float, An Online Lending Platform For Indian Entrepreneurs, Scoops Up $13M From Sequoia and SAIF

Capital Float, a financial tech startup that wants to make it easier for small businesses in India to get loans, has raised a $13 million Series A led by SAIF Partners and Sequoia Capital. Existing investor Aspada also returned for the round.
Founded in 2013 and based in Bangalore with offices in New Delhi and Mumbai, Capital Float has raised a total of $17 million to date, all within the past twelve months. Capital Float will use its Series A to expand into more cities, improve its tech platform, and launch new products.
The company is also using its equity to finance loans, but plans to open up to other sources of capital by partnering with banks and individual investors. It makes money through a combination of interest and fees.
Surfing India’s E-Commerce Boom
So far, Capital Float has loaned more than $6 million to small businesses in 12 Indian cities. Its founders, Gaurav Hinduja and Sashank Rishyasringa, say the number of applications it processes increased by 10 times in 2014, with Capital Float now receiving about 200 loan requests per month.
Capital Float’s growth has been fueled mainly by India’s rapidly growing e-commerce market, which is expected to be worth $43 billion by the end of this decade. Seventy percent of its applicants are vendors who sell goods on marketplaces like Snapdeal, Flipkart, Amazon India, PayTM, or Myntra.
While e-commerce applicants are currently Capital Float’s largest vertical, the company also intends to launch products tailored to offline businesses, such as small manufacturers and business service providers.
About 20 percent to 30 percent of applicants are approved after the platform accesses their suitability based on 2,000 data points. In addition to the usual metrics, like credit bureau scores, Capital Float’s technology scores applications based on online data, including customer feedback and transaction history from online marketplaces. It also does psychometric assessments: in other words, applicants are asked questions to judge things like their ability to scale a business, attitude toward credit, and how they compare to competitors.
Capital Float’s use of data from online sources, including e-commerce marketplaces, is similar to the system developed by Alibaba affiliate Ant Financial for its new credit-scoring system, called Sesame Credit. Like Ant Financial, Capital Float is also tackling the problem of financing entrepreneurs in countries with fast-growing industries, such as e-commerce, that are underserved by traditional financial institutions.
Closing The Financing Gap
Hinduja and Rishyasringa said they became interested in financial tech while studying for their MBAs at the Stanford Graduate School of Business. They were intrigued by U.S. companies like Lending Club and On Deck, as well as Brazil’s NuBank (another Sequoia investment), and wanted to build a similar service in India.
Rishyasringa says that formal lending institutions in India provide $140 billion in loans to small businesses each year, but there is still a funding gap of $200 billion dollars. He adds that there are currently about 30 million small-to-medium businesses in India. Together they employ a total 69 million people and many are based in smaller cities, which Capital Float plans to expand into.

‘Humanity’ Raises A $9M Series B To Build Out Its Workforce Platform

Got a tip? Let us know.MenuSearchNewsChannelsStartupsMobileGadgetsEnterpriseSocialEuropeAsiaTrendingTinderNSAAndroidGoogleMicrosoftAppleTwitterFacebookAll TopicsAll GalleriesTCTVShowsTCTV NewsBuilt in BrooklynCrunchWeekFly Or DieGadgetsIncubatedInside JobsTC CribsAll ShowsAll VideosEventsTechSupport EventsDisruptCrunchiesMeetupsInternational City EventsHackathonHardware BattlefieldIncludeNews AboutGoogle I/O 2014CESSXSWWWDC 2014

Urban Engines Takes The Power Of Its Transit Platform To Consumers With A Smart Offline Maps App

As a part-time urban planning nerd, I love visualizations of buses, trains and cars pulsating through cities. Now with more data available through smartphones, emergent logistics platforms like Uber and eventually Internet-connected and self-driving cars, it’s inevitable that software will become indispensable in managing and making mass transit more efficient.
That’s the bet of a Silicon Valley-based startup called Urban Engines that was founded by some very, very longtime former Googlers and a Stanford computer science professor named Balaji Prabhakar. Initially, they built out software to help cities like Singapore and Sao Paulo manage their public transit systems. But now they’re moving forward with a consumer-mapping app that works quickly when you’re offline.
Why, might you ask, would you need an additional mapping app when Google already provides one?
Well, Urban Engines’ app doesn’t rely on mobile Internet when you’re underground in the subway and it also has a few UI flourishes that make the experience faster than the regular Google Maps app. For one, when you boot it up, you don’t have to type in a destination; you can just drag the center of the map to wherever you’re going and it will generate different routes for you automatically.
Urban Engines has created offline maps for 10 different cities in North America, including New York, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Portland, Seattle, Toronto, Vancouver and Washington, D.C.
There’s also an X-ray mode that overlays a map over the streets and helps you figure out where you’re going.
Doing this is harder than it sounds. The 30-person company, which is backed by an undisclosed amount of funding from Eric Schmidt, Google Ventures, Andreessen Horowitz, Ram Shriram, SV Angel and others, has put together its mapping solution from OpenStreetMaps and other sources for public transit data. They’re competing against the 3,000 people who work on Google Maps.

 

© 2013 Tech Support. All rights resevered. Designed by Templateism

Back To Top